Method validation is the systematic testing that proves an analytical method is fit for its intended purpose, covering accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limit (LOD), quantitation limit (LOQ) and robustness. Pharmaceutical testing follows ICH Q2(R1) and laboratory accreditation follows ISO/IEC 17025. In method transfers and inter-laboratory comparisons, validation data are also the direct evidence of a method's suitability.
Use it after developing a new analytical method, when verifying a pharmacopoeia method in your own laboratory, when preparing for accreditation scope expansion, and for comparability assessment during method transfer. For complex matrices, add matrix-effect and recovery studies, and document instruments, reagents, personnel and dates so the validation report satisfies audit and accreditation requirements.
Enter the validation experiment data for each metric, and the tool computes accuracy (spike recovery), precision (relative standard deviation for repeatability and intermediate precision), linearity (correlation and intercept) and LOD/LOQ, then judges them against explicit acceptance criteria such as recovery 98–102% and RSD ≤ 2%. Export the validation summary table for the report, and run robustness tests to identify sensitivity to small condition changes for routine control.
Accuracy = measured/true × 100%; RSD = s/x̄ × 100%; LOD = 3.3σ/S and LOQ = 10σ/S, where σ is the standard deviation of blank responses or the regression residual and S is the slope. Validation should cover the method's entire linear range, and matrix-matched calibration is needed when matrix effects are significant.