Every measurement carries measurement uncertainty, so when a measured value lands near a tolerance limit you cannot be sure whether the true value is actually in tolerance, and deciding without accounting for this creates misjudgment risk. ISO 14253-1 defines the rule: a part is conforming only when the measured value minus the uncertainty is still above the lower limit and the measured value plus the uncertainty is still below the upper limit. If the value plus the uncertainty falls below the lower limit, or the value minus the uncertainty is above the upper limit, the part is non-conforming; anything in the overlapping gray zone cannot be decided.
Use this whenever a dimensional measurement is compared against a tolerance and you need a defensible pass or fail decision, especially for borderline parts, for incoming inspection, final inspection and first-article reporting. It is also valuable for batch release when measurement uncertainty is a meaningful fraction of the tolerance. Predefine the decision rule in the measurement procedure to avoid disputes after the fact.
Enter the nominal dimension, upper and lower tolerances, the measured values and the expanded uncertainty U (k = 2). The tool applies the ISO 14253-1 rule part by part, deciding conforming, non-conforming or indeterminate, and for batches it totals the pass, indeterminate and fail rates. If the indeterminate rate is too high, the uncertainty is too large relative to the tolerance, so upgrade the gauge or reduce measurement error, then re-measure.
Decision rule with expanded uncertainty U: conforming if LSL <= x - U and x + U <= USL; non-conforming if x - U > USL or x + U < LSL; otherwise indeterminate. For example, with USL = 10.05, LSL = 9.95 and U = 0.03, a reading of 9.98 gives x - U = 9.95 which equals LSL, and x + U = 10.01 which is below USL, so the part is conforming; a reading of 9.96 gives x - U = 9.93 which is below LSL, so it is indeterminate and needs re-measurement.