🔒 Please log in to use tool features (fill sample / analyze / AI interpretation / export document)
HomeQuality ToolsGage R&R (GRR) Analysis
Gage R&R (GRR) AnalysisFree online tool · works on PC and mobile
Use it now →

Gage R&R Analysis: %GRR Acceptance Criteria and Online Calculation

What is Gage R&R?

Gage R&R (GRR) is the core tool of Measurement System Analysis (MSA). It decomposes measurement variation into repeatability EV (the spread when one operator measures the same part repeatedly with the same gage) and reproducibility AV (the difference between operators' averages on the same parts), which combine into GRR. GRR is then combined with part-to-part variation PV into total variation TV, and %GRR = GRR/TV × 100% expresses the measurement contribution; the tool also reports the tolerance-based %P/T.

When to Use It

Use it when qualifying a new gage, improving a measurement system, preparing PPAP and control plan submissions, or before a process capability study where measurement error would distort the result. It is also the expected evidence in MSA audits. The classic design is 10 parts × 3 operators × 3 trials, with parts covering the process tolerance range.

How to Use It (Step by Step)

Select 10 parts that represent the actual process variation, have 3 operators measure each part 3 times in random order, and keep operators blind to part numbering to avoid memory bias. Paste the data into the tool and choose the Xbar-R or ANOVA method. The tool automatically computes %GRR, %P/T and ndc and gives the acceptance verdict with improvement hints for failing items.

Key Formulas / Example

%GRR = GRR/TV × 100% and ndc = 1.41 × (PV/GRR). Per AIAG MSA 4th edition: %GRR under 10% is acceptable, 10% to 30% is conditionally acceptable depending on application, cost and risk, and above 30% is unacceptable. ndc must be 5 or more; below 5 means the gage cannot distinguish between parts.

Open Gage R&R (GRR) Analysis → Calculate online in your browser · free registration · PC and mobile
MSA Discussions · Latest
No discussions yet — be the first to ask a question in the community.
Feature Overview · each feature has its own guide page
More features coming soon
Frequently Asked Questions
Should %GRR be judged against total variation or tolerance?
Look at both: %GRR (against total variation) reflects the measurement share of process variation and is used for process monitoring, while %P/T (against tolerance) reflects measurement error as a share of the specification and is used for tolerance decisions. The tool reports both.
What if GRR is unacceptable?
First identify the dominant contributor: large EV points to equipment, fixturing or method issues; large AV points to operator technique, training or reading standards; a significant interaction points to part-operator matching. Improve accordingly and rerun the study.
Is 10×3×3 mandatory?
No. It is the AIAG-recommended classic design; as few as 5 parts can be used but more parts give more stable estimates. For destructive testing where the same part cannot be remeasured, use a nested GRR design instead.
What does an ndc below 5 mean?
The gage resolution is insufficient to reliably distinguish parts, so the measurement system is not sensitive enough to process variation. Use a higher-resolution gage or improve the measurement method, then repeat the study.