Nonparametric tests do not assume that the population follows a particular distribution (such as normal); they base inference on the ranks or signs of the data, which makes them robust to outliers and skewed distributions. They typically test the location (median) of the distribution rather than the mean. When sample sizes are small, data are heavily skewed, outliers are abundant, or the data are ordinal (such as satisfaction scores), nonparametric methods are a reliable alternative to parametric tests, at the cost of slightly lower power when the data actually satisfy the parametric assumptions.
Use the Mann-Whitney U test (also called the Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for two independent samples; the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data; the Kruskal-Wallis test (the nonparametric version of ANOVA) for several independent samples; the Friedman test for several matched or repeated-measurement groups; and the sign test when only the direction matters or the data are ordinal or extreme. The tool recommends the appropriate method automatically from your data type.
The tool ranks the raw data, converts them to ranks, computes statistics such as U, W and H, and gives p-values. A p-value below 0.05 rejects the null hypothesis that the two (or more) groups have the same location, indicating a significant difference; a p-value >= 0.05 means insufficient evidence. Because nonparametric tests express the difference through medians, the tool also outputs the group medians and distribution plots (boxplots, dot plots) to help interpretation. Note that nonparametric tests usually have lower power than parametric tests, so small samples may fail to detect a real difference.
Log in, first decide the data type (independent/paired, two groups/multiple groups) and run a normality test; if the data deviate strongly from normal or are ordinal, select the corresponding nonparametric test, paste the data, and the tool performs the rank conversion, statistic computation and p-value output automatically, with a comparison hint against the parametric test (t-test/ANOVA) and AI interpretation. When multiple groups are significant, continue with a rank-based post-hoc comparison (such as Dunn's test) to locate the source of the difference.