Safety Integrity Level (SIL) is defined in IEC 61508/IEC 61511 and measures the ability of a safety instrumented function (SIF) to perform its required action on demand, ranging from SIL 1 to SIL 4. Higher levels demand more: SIL 1 requires a PFDavg between 10^-1 and 10^-2, SIL 2 between 10^-2 and 10^-3, and SIL 3 between 10^-3 and 10^-4. The rating result should be reviewed by a multi-discipline team and recorded in the safety requirements specification (SRS) to guide design.
LOPA is the common method: start from the initiating event frequency, subtract the risk reduction of each independent protection layer, and convert the remaining required reduction into a target PFDavg and SIL for the SIF. The tool has a built-in PFDavg-SIL lookup table, so entering the required reduction factor directly suggests a SIL. Consequence-severity and demand-mode paths are also supported for different plant scenarios.
Safety instrumented system design in chemical, refining, oil-and-gas and other high-hazard processes; SRS development and verification; SIL verification (checking whether an existing SIS architecture meets the requirement); and functional-safety delivery after HAZOP/LOPA. SIL verification should be recalculated in the detailed design phase using the actual hardware and diagnostic scheme.
The tool outputs the target PFDavg, suggested SIL, risk reduction factor and architecture requirements. SIL verification must use the actual architecture (1oo1, 1oo2, 2oo3, etc.) and diagnostic coverage; redundant structures lower PFD but introduce common-cause failure, which must be corrected with a beta factor. Life-cycle documentation - rating, verification, operation and maintenance records - is mandatory.